Nem Obama nem McCain

[Apáte]

Why McCain must lose
by Joseph Farah

Posted: May 19, 2008
1:00 am Eastern

© 2008

The hopelessly misnamed People for the American Way cited me as a notable holdout among "right-wing activists" tripping over themselves to fall in line with the Republican presidential candidate.

Despite the group's penchant for mislabeling others as much as it mislabels itself, a dispatch did quote me accurately as saying: "All things being equal, I'd rather watch the Democrats destroy America for the next four years, holding out hope that a new kind of Republican leadership might arise to fight back in 2012."

I said it, and I mean it.

There is no question in my mind that if Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton sits in the White House for the next four years, especially with the backing of a Democratic Congress, that they will put in place policies that will anger Americans.

They will set the stage for their own undoing. They will have nothing to complain about any more. They will have all the levers of power at their disposal. They will have no excuses. They will be forced to create the panacea they have been promising for so long.

And, of course, they will fail.

Their ideas simply don't work. They create misery, not prosperity. They create strife, not unity. They make war, not peace.

If the Democrats have all the cards, as they last did briefly in 1993 and 1994, they will overreach, and the American people will know who to blame.

On the other hand, if John McCain wins, he will institute most of the same policy prescriptions. He will steal your money to fight phantom problems like "global warming." He will do away with tax cuts he opposed in the first place. He will approve federal funding of embryonic stem cell research. He will promote amnesty for illegal aliens. He will sign legislation attacking constitutionally protected political speech. He will nominate judges who will get the easy approval of the Democrats in the Senate.

It's really difficult for me to see any substantive difference between McCain and Obama or McCain and Clinton.

Oh, he will continue the war in Iraq and Afghanistan, but he will ensure our troops are handcuffed by rules of engagement dictated by politicians who simply have no comprehension of the kind of enemy we face. And McCain will be content to keep fighting, presumably without victory, for 100 years, as he suggested.

In other words, Americans lose no matter who wins in November.

But, there is more hope for positive change in the short term with a Democratic sweep.

Here's the difference: Democrats will finally get the chance to conduct their diabolical social experiment on America without restraint if they hold on to Congress and take the White House. It won't take long for Americans to see the error of their ways. We last saw it between 1976 and 1980. What followed was the most glorious political revolution of the 20th century under the leadership of Ronald Reagan.

I say let's get it over with.

McCain will cause as just as much pain as Obama or Hillary, but Americans will be confused about why. They won't know who to blame. Democrats will surely blame him – the only Republican in their way. And a McCain presidency is more likely to lead to a Democrat White House in 2012.

Further, if McCain wins, he will spend the next four years insisting it was his maverick brand of Republicanism – his willingness "to reach across the aisle" and find compromise and common ground – that led to victory for the GOP. Who will be able to argue effectively against that idea?

No, I won't be a part of that scenario. McCain could well beat Obama or Clinton. They are deeply flawed candidates. But he will get no help from me. I honestly believe America will be better off taking its medicine now – delivered by clearly identifiable "progressives" like Obama and Clinton.

They will set the stage for the emergence of another grand revolution like we experienced in 1980. McCain, on the other hand, could lead us into 40 years in the political wilderness.



FONTE: http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php? ... geId=64647
Retirado do site WorldNetDaily

---

Joseph Farah is founder, editor and CEO of WND and a nationally syndicated columnist with Creators Syndicate. His latest book is "Stop The Presses: The Inside Story of the New Media Revolution." He also edits the online intelligence newsletter Joseph Farah's G2 Bulletin, in which he utilizes his sources developed over 30 years in the news business.

[Apáte]

"He (John McCain) will promote amnesty for illegal aliens."

Acho que a suposta senilidade dele não chegaria a tanto. Se bem que David Icke já alertava há tempos que republicanos, maçons e Illuminati estavam adubando o solo da crosta para chegada dos reptlianos.

[Apáte]

Até o Parlata critica as verdades de McCain.

[Apáte]

Se há uma necessidade real que o presidente seja preto (preto mesmo):

Alan Keyes, candidato independente que fora rejeitado pelo Partido da Constituição.


Outras opções do Farah:


Chuck Baldwin, candidato pelo Partido da Constituição.



Bob Barr, candidato pelo Partido Libertário (Libertarian Party).

[RicardoVitor]

RON PAUL

[Apáte]

RON PAUL

Este já se foi, meu filho.

---

A opção do guerreiro pelo "longo prazo"
Sexta-feira, Março 07, 2008



Ron Paul desistiu hoje de sua candidatura presidencial. Dr. Paul, como seus apoiadores gostam de chamá-lo, anunciou em um vídeo divulgado no You Tube que não mais concorre, mas que incentiva seus apoiadores a levar o máximo possível de delegados para Convenção. Muitos daqueles que acreditam nas idéias propagadas por ele ainda concorrem em vários distritos do país para chegar ao Congresso.

Vencer tem muitos significados. Inciar um processo, incitar a discussão, organizar grupos, levantar questões polêmicas. Dr. Paul fez tudo isso e foi, inclusive, ridicularizado pelos conservadores dentro do GOP. Mas enquanto uns colocavam sua fortuna pessoal em jogo e outros tinham dificuldade de levantar recursos, Dr. Paul bateu recordes diários de levantamento de fundos. Seus apoios vieram de pequenas doações, microempresários, da classe média, ou seja, doações individuais que chegaram aos milhões e milhões.

A campanha não decolou, mas Dr. Paul ocupou seu espaço e deu seu recado: Liberdades individuais, uma economia aberta e livre, defesa da propriedade privada e política externa não-intervencionista. Este é Dr. Paul, um autêntico libertário, em sua mais ampla forma, e talvez por isso os conservadores tenham um problema com ele.

Suas idéias agora serão publicados em um livro: "The Revolution, a Manifesto". Muitas vitórias foram alcançadas. Um movimento em prol da liberdade plena foi lançado e um processo de organização em prol dessas idéias, foi iniciado.

Para aqueles que desejam visitar o vídeo com as palavras do Dr. Ron Paul, podem acessar:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rk_vVaZxTno

"Eleições são esforços de curto prazo. Revoluções são projetos de longo prazo". Dr. Paul é um guerreiro e por isso tem a minha admiração e respeito. Sempre.


FONTE: http://marciocoimbra.blogspot.com/2008/ ... reiro.html
Retirado do Blog Diários de Washington